|
|||
|
First 5.0L V8 in a big-3 car... the Z28.
Since no one else has posted here, juut thought I'd throw ya a trivia bone.... the "5-Oh" displacement made famous by the Fox-body Mustangs in the 80's, was actually a 4.9L V8 (Ford decided to "round it up" for marketing
).Even so, the first 5.0L V8 was actually a 302ci V8 made by Chevy to compete in the Trans Am series, under a 305ci displacement class limit. At the time, Chevy's only real options were a 283ci V8 and a 327ci V8 (another legendary engine). To get under the 305ci limit they took the 327's block (which is nearly identical to the 350, most lately related to the 4th gen's LT1) and stuck a slightly smaller crank from the 283ci. The hybrid of both the shorter stroke and wider piston bores resulted in a 302ci V8 which cleaned up in their class to win Trans Am championships in 1968 and 1969. After GM pulled from the series, Ford finally managed to win a few years (in the 70's) before they also pulled out their factory-backed teams. :p Chevy's 302 engine in race tune supposedly put down 400 to 500 net horsepower, but was available in 1967 Camaros with a 290hp rating. This engine was designated by RPO code ... Z28, and it's been in the Camaro option list ever since (although it later became an option group, instead of just the engine RPO). Here's Popular Mechanics take on it: (http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...ro/print.phtml) Quote:
![]() Last edited by Steve n Seattle; 05-18-2003 at 01:15 AM.. |
|
||||
|
302
First the 327 block wasn't just nearly identical, it was!! GM used the same block castings in 67 to make 302's 350's and 327's. (1967 being the first year of the 350 and the only year a small main journal 350 was made.) The only difference was the stroke length and the piston pin height. The 283's 3" stroke combined with the 327's, and then new 350's, 4" stroke made for a 301.6 CID engine, rounded up to 302.
And to answer 86redrocket... in the late 60's and early 70's cars gained alot of weight. The short 3" stroke didn't make a very impressive amount of TQ. Yes they make great HP at higher RPM but tourque is what gives you that seat of the pants feel when you step on the gas. The 327's 3.25" stroke had done the trick in the past but the 3.48" stroke of the new 350 made more TQ to get these ever growing cars moving. It is not all that uncommon for displacements to be somewhat inflated. The 350 is accually 349.8 CID and the 454 is 454.2 CID. All manufactures round up to the nearest whole number. Simply because saying "I've got a 350" sounds better than " I've got a 349.8". |
|
|||
|
to awsum69
we have a 68 z-28 lamans blue we are 2nd owners of this org. 46,000 mile car. only non matching part is water pump. this car can rev 7,000 rpm all day long. it is fun to drive. other toys in the house are 92-z28 25th aniv. red with black stringer, 79 vette, silver looks stock but has 425 h.p with every thing built to handle, the power. regards o.m. louie sater lsaterz28@msn.com |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I want to get a 327 for it but im gonna keep the L6 so if i ever sell the car i can put the L6 back in and sell it for much more $$$ because part # matching are worth allot ![]() later! joe
__________________
Joe "not bad for a 17 year old" Restoring my old mans high school car, a 1969 camaro. Rotted in a feild for 22 years, now completly gutted and undergoing a full race chassis job featuring the famed Art Morrison "Tri-fourbar" rear suspention. Every details there. Its a project... ![]() Thank God I can weld http://www.cardomain.com/ride/755309 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Weird issues with starting car | GotZPower | Engine Tech | 8 | 07-20-2006 08:40 AM |
| Help needed ASAP, car on side of road | Jpack | Engine Tech | 19 | 07-16-2006 03:45 PM |
| Pace car history | Mykdiver | History | 3 | 10-20-2003 12:35 PM |
| LS1 Z28 vs WRX | T_Boxter | Street/Strip Racing | 42 | 03-11-2003 12:25 AM |
| 94 Z28 Need mechanic to rebuild engine! | nccountryflower | Engine Tech | 4 | 03-02-2003 04:22 PM |